If each first nation reaches its final agreement, it also obtains a self-management agreement (SGA). This agreement emerges from Chapter 24 of the Framework Agreement and defines the powers, authorities and responsibilities of First Nation governments. The agreements provide funding that supports the provision of programs and services at the First Nation level. After the AMS, the First Nation now has the power to pass and pass laws about its country and its citizens, tax them, provide urban planning, and manage or manage countries and resources. Each first nation will have a constitution that will contain the membership code, establish governing bodies and provide for its powers and protect the rights and freedoms of citizens. As self-governing bodies, First Nations are not prevented from asserting the rights of a Canadian citizen or business. This pioneering agreement provides a framework for the consultation of all exploration activities carried out by Strategic in the traditional territory of the CAFN, with the exception of Category A and B Inland within the meaning of the Framework Agreement. The agreement is particularly noteworthy, as consultation is expected to begin in the early stages of exploration and continue throughout the project. Recognition of the rights inherent to the CAFN and self-interest in the area – maintenance and operation of the park by CAFN and the intention that CAFN be responsible for all field work – Presentation of CAFN heritage by a network of regional hiking trails, former localities, campsites, cabins, hideouts, trail markers, petroglyphs, etc.
– Declaration that THE CAFN has exclusive authority over the use of Aboriginal languages , place names, former CAFN community sites and cultural heritage itineraries as well as on the interpretation and presentation of Aboriginal history and traditional use – Obligation that the CAFN, B.C. and the Board of Directors will jointly and cooperatively identify the cultural areas of the park – Guarantee that B.C. will consult with CAFN before amending the parking law in one way or another that would seriously infringe the rights of the NSC under the agreement , and will negotiate in good faith any changes to the agreement. At the same time, it is necessary to keep the administrative agreement and parking identity on the political agenda.